GIGI / SHAPE x LAYER EXPERIMENT / STAGE 4

Which geometry and layering change the impact response?

Three shapes. Three structures. Five impact configurations. Equal target shell and foam mass, with the same synthetic head and inner coverage.

Research simulation, not a helmet safety rating. These are unfiltered responses of an assumed headform and material model. The head has no neck or brain; the assembly has no facemask, retention, shell damage or debonding. Friction and foam unloading are assumptions.

Inspect the shell geometry and material directions

Actual screening mesh, shown at a common scale. Marks show the local ply material axis; they are not continuous manufactured fiber paths. Gold marks identify elements using the alternate coordinate chart. The face opening is visible; a facemask and chinstrap are not modeled.

The actual shapes tested

Composite shellUniform B foamSoft A inner foamFirm C outer foam

Sagittal sections at the same scale; front is to the right. Liner thickness varies with shape. Layer interfaces and shell thickness come from the computational inputs.

Comparison across all five impacts

Each entry reports its worst response across crown, front, side, rear and oblique impacts. The score is the largest of three ratios to the baseline oval with conventional fiber order. Lower is better for this chosen numerical objective; it is not an injury score.

Shape / structureWorst linear
m/s²
Worst angular
rad/s²
Worst spin
rad/s
Relative scoreCases

Inspect the measured response histories

Blue: selected designBrown: oval / conventional fibers / uniform B baseline

Polished concept presentation

The oval A/C concept shown here illustrates the layer architecture. Its hardware, vents and cosmetic surfaces are not part of the simulation; choosing it for the rendering does not identify a winning design.

Illustrative oval helmet cutawayIllustrative front, side and exploded layer design plate

What the checks establish

Layer definitions and controlled comparisons

QI_B: mirrored [0,45,-45,90,0,45,-45,90] half-stack; uniform B foam. BAL_B: mirrored [-45,45,0,90,90,45,0,-45] half-stack; uniform B foam. This pair isolates ply order. BAL_AC: the same selected shell with A foam inside and C outside; the interface is placed to match the uniform B foam mass.

The outer shapes share the head-contact surface and covered head region. Foam volume is matched; shell ply thickness is adjusted to match shell mass. This does not keep local contact curvature or local cushioning stroke constant: those are the geometric variables being tested.

Numerical and physical limits

Normal velocity is 3 m/s. The oblique case adds 3 m/s tangential velocity. The assumed wall friction is 0.2. Impacts run for 6 ms initially; unfinished contact cases are withheld or extended. Head motion is reconstructed from eight rigid-cap node histories, sampled every 25 microseconds. The head reference is the nominal rigid cap's center of mass, fixed in that body.

Energy, hourglass energy, added mass, rigid-motion fit and end-of-contact checks are applied. Foam compression is checked at eight Gauss locations per element on every 0.25 ms frame. This does not bound every intervening solver step or validate multiaxial material behavior. Constitutive data, unloading and failure must be calibrated against experiments before making protection claims.

Download all-case CSV · Full comparison JSON · Models, inputs and evidence package