Davis Geometric
Technical study / Davis–Landau study

Superfluids / obstacles, winding, and onset

Research settingIndependent

The Davis–Landau study asks whether obstacle geometry organizes the onset of vortices in Gross–Pitaevskii simulations. The research object is a simulated transition, measured relative to the model’s sound speed.

Source: Davis–Landau v3, obstacle definitions and Table 2. Drawn profiles are explanatory; the species thresholds are manuscript-reported dimensionless simulation results. Inspect the full technical study →

From the research record

Inspect the work

Original figures, recorded values, and explicit model details. Each exhibit identifies its source and what the comparison means.

01 / Deposited simulation table

The two obstacle regimes actually compared

Scroll horizontally to inspect the full table →

The two obstacle regimes actually compared
Obstacle Dimensionless parameters β: ⁸⁷Rb β: ²³Na β: ⁷Li
Gaussian, semi-hard σ = 3ξ; V₀ = 50μ 0.486 0.486 0.486
Tanh-wall, hard R = 8ξ; V₀ = 1000μ 0.425 0.425 0.425

β = vc / cs; ξ is healing length and μ chemical potential. These are the reported values at the sampled thresholds, not zero-uncertainty physical constants. Equal dimensionless outcomes for three parameterizations of a rescaled Gross–Pitaevskii model do not establish universality across temperatures, obstacle families or experiments.

davis_landau_sonic_onset.pdf · Version 3, Table 2, PDF page 16

Read the technical figure

Source: Davis–Landau v3, obstacle definitions and Table 2. Drawn profiles are explanatory; the species thresholds are manuscript-reported dimensionless simulation results.

Source: Davis–Landau v3, obstacle definitions and Table 2. Drawn profiles are explanatory; the species thresholds are manuscript-reported dimensionless simulation results.

Supporting detail

Complementary technical detail: Source: Davis–Landau v3, obstacle definitions and Table 2. Drawn profiles are explanatory; the species thresholds are manuscript-reported dimensionless simulation results.
Complementary technical detail: Source: Davis–Landau v3, obstacle definitions and Table 2. Drawn profiles are explanatory; the species thresholds are manuscript-reported dimensionless simulation results.

From a flow disturbance to an onset measurement

The historical record describes simulations for several condensate species and proposes a geometric critical-velocity relation. Normalizing velocity by sound speed makes cases comparable, but the comparison still depends on the nondimensionalization, interaction model, obstacle potential, and boundary conditions.

A vortex is identified through the phase structure of the complex condensate field. The phase-winding construction below explains what that diagnostic looks for. It is not one of the study’s measured speed thresholds.

What a collapse across species would establish

If several normalized simulation curves follow a common relation, that is evidence about the chosen equations and parameter ranges. It does not alone show independence from dimension, temperature, preparation, or dissipation. The relation could reflect common modeling assumptions as well as a useful geometric simplification.

The onset decision also has a time scale. A brief disturbance and sustained vortex production can receive different labels under different observation windows. A representative account must retain the window and detection rule alongside the reported critical velocity.

Sources, scope, and next question

Existing simulation manuscript; the scope of any proposed onset law remains the simulated regimes.

The next revision should put the actual obstacle families, speed scans, and phase-winding detections beside the proposed law, including cases that depart from it. Those records are more informative than a claim of species-independent universality.

  1. The Davis-Landau Sonic Onset Law: Universal Critical Velocity for Vortex Nucleation in Bose-Einstein Condensates.